## MSPhysics 1.0.3 (16 October 2017)

### Re: MSPhysics 1.0.3 (16 October 2017)

25.jpg

Wanted 2 curves...

2curves.jpg
0
Frenchy Pilou
Is beautiful that please without concept!
Speedy Galerie

pilou
Top SketchUcator

### Re: MSPhysics 1.0.3 (16 October 2017)

That can't work with these prisms!
There are overlapings!
Works for 2 perpendicular "lines" but not for a checkerboard!

Here with a pyramid with 5° basis

Tronque.jpg
1
Frenchy Pilou
Is beautiful that please without concept!
Speedy Galerie

pilou
Top SketchUcator

### Re: MSPhysics 1.0.3 (16 October 2017)

I found my error and won half of joints!
No so evident to find the good angles following sizes!

GIF_mieux.gif
GIF_mieux2.gif
3
Frenchy Pilou
Is beautiful that please without concept!
Speedy Galerie

pilou
Top SketchUcator

### Re: MSPhysics 1.0.3 (16 October 2017)

Hello Anton_S
We thank you very much for this effort
I was hoping the work would Export in mdl format
Is there a way for that?

Thanks ..
0

azizxpx

### Re: MSPhysics 1.0.3 (16 October 2017)

Hello, could you help me?

1. I need a command, a function that allows to find out the position of the pusher at any time by using the keys, for example. At the moment the position of the pusher is bound to the sensor. The box crosses the sensor, the sensor issues a task for the movement of the puher. Also, when we touch the sensor, we display the coordinates of the pusher. The command “puts” didn’t help, it show the text, but we need the changing value.

2. I need a command that is triggered by the condition: "sensor 2" = 1, "sensor 3" = 1, moreover, when the box leaves the sensor's range, "sensor 2" = 0. The pusher moves to a value of -70 when there are 2 boxes on the conveyor in the range of sensors 2 and 3.
The problem is as follows: the pusher is triggered by the condition if laser2 && laser3> 0, fly = -70, written in the script of sensor 3.
But when the box crosses the sensor 3, only one condition is triggered (laser3> 0), the boxes do not accumulate.
Is there a function (onTouch, onUpdate, etc.) where you can write a condition via an if for two sensors?
0

mkurmanalinova

### Re: MSPhysics 1.0.3 (16 October 2017)

Does anyone know of a work around to install on a mac in SKU2019?
0

eosmontana

### Re: MSPhysics 1.0.3 (16 October 2017)

eosmontana wrote:Does anyone know of a work around to install on a mac in SKU2019?

As per earlier posts in this thread, the extension doesn't work in versions later than 2018 so there's no point installing it for SketchUp 2019. The author is working on a new version and it'll be released as soon as it is ready.
0
Etaoin Shrdlu

%

(THERE'S NO PLACE LIKE)

G28 X0.0 Y0.0 Z0.0

M30

%

Dave R
Global Moderator

### Re: MSPhysics 1.0.3 (16 October 2017)

Hello are there any updates on when this could be compatible with SU2020 & 2021?

Thanks!
0

ak-sam

### Re: MSPhysics 1.0.3 (16 October 2017)

ak-sam wrote:Hello are there any updates on when this could be compatible with SU2020 & 2021?

Thanks!

See: viewtopic.php?f=323&t=56852&start=840#p656107
0
Etaoin Shrdlu

%

(THERE'S NO PLACE LIKE)

G28 X0.0 Y0.0 Z0.0

M30

%

Dave R
Global Moderator

### Re: MSPhysics Preview

Hi Anton,
Any news on when you'll be able to release an updated version of this wonderful Plugin?
Best,
Juan
2

pinyol

### Re: MSPhysics 1.0.3 (16 October 2017)

Hello.
I have a question for the participants of this forum.

I would like to use the videos I made with "mspysics" and "sketchup make" for commercial purposes, what do you guys do in such cases?

If I have a "sketchup" license, am I not in violation?

Or do I have to buy "sketchup pro 2017" somehow?

I posted a question here because the terms and conditions of sketchup.com don't make sense to me.

Please let me know what you think.
0

kaoru_komine

### Re: MSPhysics 1.0.3 (16 October 2017)

Hi Anton,
I am also awaiting the release of an SKU2021 compatible version of MS Physics..Can we expect to see this soon?
0

### Re: MSPhysics 1.0.3 (16 October 2017)

kaoru_komine wrote:I would like to use the videos I made with "mspysics" and "sketchup make" for commercial purposes, what do you guys do in such cases?

The terms of use for SketchUp 2017 Make are clear that it may not be used for commercial purposes. Having a license for an older version of SketchUp does not change the EULA for Make. If you need more clarification on that you should seek legitimate legal counsel.

kaoru_komine wrote:Or do I have to buy "sketchup pro 2017" somehow?

At this stage it's not likely that Trimble would sell you a license for SU2017 Pro. It's long out of support and they don't sell licenses for unsupported versions. The current version for which they are providing licenses is 2021.
1
Etaoin Shrdlu

%

(THERE'S NO PLACE LIKE)

G28 X0.0 Y0.0 Z0.0

M30

%

Dave R
Global Moderator

### Re: MSPhysics 1.0.3 (16 October 2017)

Hello Anton,
I hope you are fine and as a programming and physics genius you have a lot to do ...
My questions:
Is it feasible to make the existing (ingenious) MSPhysics compatible with SketchUp 2021 and what effort would that require?
SketchUp and Ruby API have changed a few times in the meantime.
Could outsiders with more or less programming knowledge help you? Possibly also financially.
You're working on a new version. Can someone help you with testing?
Otherwise, porting the last version v1.0.3 to SUp2021 would be very helpful, as you already have to keep 3 SketchUp versions:
SUp2016 32bit for Sketchy Physics, SUp2017Make for MSPhysics and the current SUp version for daily work.
I hope the users' interest in exercises and simulations on a physical basis for SketchUp does not wane.
Since SketchUp is only available in paid versions anyway and since more and more professional plugins are chargeable, this would also be conceivable for MSPhysics.
Well, moaned enough.
Best regards, Andreas
0

faust07