i was wondering the same. i see the flash button on the toolbar at the post window, but havn't been able to get it to work. it would be a good thing b/c you can use camstudio to do quick video tutorials.
Im not sure how you do it just from a file, but if you want to do it form youtube or something similar, the code is: [flash=widthxheight]URL of video goes here[/flash]
Perhaps you could upload it to youtube first then insert it?
where the numbers after the "flash=" tag are the width and height of the flash movie (you can actually adjust this to your needs although it may affect the quality displayed).
This is how it looks like when not using the code tags:
The code Gunawan entered is a html code to embed your videos into a webpage. It cannot be used here (the forum works with BBcodes not with html)
The problem with YouTube is that the link there doesn't point to the swf file itself but to some database place where it is stored or something. You will need to find an "independent" place where you can store your swf files and display them here correctly (i.e. the URL has to end with the .swf file extension like mine above). _______
Now, i want to put a link to display the video directly in full screen.
With Photobucket, no problem to find the url because the full screen opens in a new window with apparent link. With YouTube it is different because the full screen option really takes the full screen and also masks the link, even in the web browser history.
After searching a little i have found a trick.
You take this now famous src="link" in the embeded link and cut the end line of code behind &. The resulting link leads not to a full screen but to a full browser's window, witch is in my point of vue pretty more efficient.
For example: Aidanchopra "Mapping photo textures to curved surfaces"
Please note that in this case we don't need [flash=][/flash] code anymore i put an image link into [img]code and this resulting code into [url] code with [url=youtubelink]heading.
Dear Gaieus, you definitely are our precious "listening man". Many thanks for that. Dear Mike, it's always a pleasant while to pass into your corner bar. Thank to come and let a friendly word. So i keep it Up. _____________________________________________________________________
i was wondering if Youtube video's quality was changed accordingly to various dimensions
Comparing embeded links code we can say that this is not the case. The code simply operate a zooming. Consequently: we can set the size we want. ____
I have made a search for you to find some free screen ruler which is a useful tool in that sort of work. (the screen ruler i am using is part of a suite which is not a free software, so i can't suggest it) Windows softwares: JR Screen Ruler Pixel Ruler Free Screen Ruler
I haver used the free JR Screen Ruler (it also has a Pro version with more features) and found it pretty handy. Thanks for mentioning it, Simon; I believe that it could be useful for many here.
Thank you Susan and Malaise. It's always a pleasure to meet people on our own thread. I see Malaise talking around in SCF since a long time. Dear (queen) Susan i didn't saw you until today, please welcome on this board.
for today, just a little reminder.
how to maintain the proportions of a rectangle, or in another way how to maintain the ratio ?
The so famous and so useful in daylife "Cross-multiplication" is the solution. ( In french we say: "la règle de trois")
In our case,
Width >> (for) height
a >> (for) b
Our purpose: if width=x , height y=?
solution: cross-multiplication
a >> b x >> y cross-multiplication: a*y=x*b => y=x*b/a
exemple a=640 >> b=480
if x=320 >> y=320*480/640=240
(Re) in this particular case, 640/2=320 and it's easy to find that 480/2=240 ;-)
For today i am interested on video quality comparison between various hosts services.
The shooting is mine, taken in front of my Kitchen early in the morning. Maybe it's not the better exemple for comparison, no way, i like it! I don't know why there is often a problem to load viddler screen inside a mixed videos display ? When i put it alone on a post it works very well; with perhaps the best quality. >> So i put others one on the next post
For me, Viddler and Photobucket are better picture quality (Vimeo also good but difficulties to load the videos) -Youtube have lost Adobe premiere express editing options, but still have developped notes, sounds and so on. -Photobucket still deployed Adobe premiere express for (nearly basic) editing options -Viddler has developped an interesting system to add video comments along the strip (good word?). And also, Upload is not bad because time saving. we need just to stay the time for uploading the file. Encoding is done after: a mail can be sent to annonce the achievement.
:-)simonlebon
Last edited by simon le bon on Thu May 07, 2009 11:43 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Hi everybody, probably my last post on this thread (but who knows)..
Well nothing really new Here. I have just found in mind that it would be cool to link up full screen video with displayed video rather than an single picture as i did in a previous post.
Good improvement (taken from kirill): It is possible to embed a set of several videos with the same link using YOUTUBE. !!! "and arrange them the way you want"
You just need a Youtube account (but who haven't one ? )
->You have to open a new Playlist, and fill it with the set of videos you want to share (not necessarily yours). After what you have to embed it in SCF with the famous "SRC" link.. Very simple
Beautiful video you are showing. I'm glad if this study can be useful. I have to mention that YouTube video quality had grown a lot since my previous tests. Tell me if I'm wrong but I think it is now the best quality we can find.
Time passing this thread is becoming a grabbing box for Youtube services.
Today I would like mention PWN YouTube for who wants to download YouTube videos in flv or in plain MP4 quality
simon
Last edited by simon le bon on Fri Jan 29, 2010 2:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I have been having great luck with YouTube keeping my full resolution of videos when I record them at their recommended sizes. My text is very sharp and readable, which is a must for my (rather boring) ruby plugin tutorials I've been doing. So I'd also have to agree that YouTube quality has greatly improved.